San Siro Stadium Sale Price Set to Drop by €30 Million, Sparking Political Backlash

The sale price of the San Siro stadium by the City of Milan to Inter and AC Milan is expected to be reduced by approximately €30 million, dropping from the €197 million established by the Revenue Agency to around €160 million. According to reports from Repubblica, this reduction in the final stages of the deal between the City and the clubs is linked to remediation costs and other ancillary expenses that the municipal administration is expected to cover.

This proposal has been met with opposition from majority coalition city councilors who are already critical of the stadium’s sale. These councilors have previously voted against the measure in the City Council, and the deliberation is scheduled for a final vote in September.

PD councilor Alessandro Giungi expressed his dismay, stating, “The news that the City intends to slash €30 million from the €197 that the real estate funds controlling Milan and Inter will pay for the ownership of San Siro and the surrounding areas is truly disconcerting.” He challenged the justification that the city is responsible for cleanup costs under a new stadium law, arguing, “No one forces them to use that legislation… If the funds are requesting its application, it should be even clearer that there is a complete absence of public interest in this entire operation.”

Carlo Monguzzi of the Greens was also critical, calling the price cut “a discontinuity: we are doing worse than before. A further gift to the speculative funds! From 197 million to 160.” He added, “Now San Siro costs less than the Pirellone [the Pirelli skyscraper]. It is then offensive to say that the Council will decide how to spend the money: this is the role of the city council, not a concession from the monarch.”

share this news:

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Telegram

看看这些相关内容

米兰圣西罗球场售价或降三千万欧

米兰市政府向国际米兰和AC米兰俱乐部出售圣西罗球场的交易价格可能下调约3000万欧元,从意大利税务局原核定的1.97亿欧元降至1.6亿欧元。据悉,价格调整涉及环境治理及其他附属费用支出责任归属问题。 该方案引发执政党议员强烈反对。部分此前已对球场出售持批评态度的议员表示将投反对票,最终决议将于九月提交市议会审议。 民主党议员亚历山德罗·琼吉质疑:”若因球场法案规定市政当局需承担新建设施环境治理费用而降价,这完全缺乏法律强制性。若基金公司要求适用该条款,更印证整项交易缺乏公共利益考量。”绿党议员卡洛·蒙古齐批评称:”降价举措实为向投机基金提供额外优惠,如今圣西罗估值竟低于皮雷利大厦。市议会本应具有资金使用决策权,而非等待君主恩赐。” 本次售价调整争议凸显市政资产处置中公共利益与商业利益的平衡难题。

Read More